Here’s the latest Indexed post. Jessica’s past posts can be found here, her own blog here, and her book here.

Here’s the latest Indexed post. Jessica’s past posts can be found here, her own blog here, and her book here.

« Previous Post Using the Law to Protect Friendship Seems Yucky: A Guest Post
Next Post » Success Cannot Be Legislated: Who Said It?
Keep up with the latest Freakonomics news and chatter at Big Buzz. And here's more:
Why do I get the feeling that all the people developing fascinating new technologies read X-Men as children?
Uh, where is the “-or-” part. Otherwise this is meaningless…
I love your Venn diagrams, but this one is wrong. Really.
“What China is trying to control” is a superset of everything you drew, not the intersection.
Talk about a bunch of pedants on this site. What would you prefer? A list titled “What China is Trying To Control” then 1, 2, 3?
It’s a joke. It’s humor. 90% of readers look at this and chuckle, 5% don’t get it, and 5% obsess over the logical correctness of someone else’s sketch on an index card.
BTW love the work Jessica.
That one made me laugh. I agree with GeneralDisarray.
@Jim C
No, its right.
Try it like this:
{something China is trying to control} implies {The World Population}
vs.
{The World Population} implies {something China is trying to control}
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Implies.html
This would be even funnier if you could work in the Chinese attempting to control their image to TV viewers, i.e., the the lip-synching incident at the Olympics opening ceremonies, where they had a cute girl on TV, with the chubby girl singing.
I agree with Jim C.
Yeah, I get that these are jokes, but to me a big part of the fun is the cleverness in making otherwise dull charts and diagrams work correctly. This one misses the mark.