Is the Waiting Room Necessary?

I spent 40 minutes waiting to begin diagnostic tests preparatory to seeing my ophthalmologist. What a waste of my valuable time! And my calculations from data from the American Time Use Survey suggest that this is a standard problem: the average adult American spends four hours per year waiting for medical or dental care, with each wait averaging around 45 minutes.

Pricing this time out at even half the average wage rate, the cost amounts to about $5 billion per year. Seems like a lot, and very inefficient, but what is the alternative?

The only way that every medical provider could ensure no waiting would be for the provider to have downtime herself, in order to have unutilized resources, both of her time and the services of the capital stock used in the practice. I’m not sure what’s the right mix of provider and customer waiting; but as annoying as my waiting is, the current system may be economically efficient.

TAGS:

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

 

COMMENTS: 76

  1. Kimota94 says:

    We have the same scenario in Canada, and I’ve long thought that what we need is some system whereby the medical / dental office can update you, in real-time, as far as how things are running. If I’m at work at 4:00 and have a 4:30 dentist appointment, I’d love to know that they’re running 25 minutes behind so that I can plan to show up at 4:45 (let’s say), instead of a few mins before 4:30. That alone would save me 15 mins. Maybe Twitter or something like that could be used to accomplish this?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Milton Recht says:

    Actually, studies of ways to reduce wait times for doctors were done.

    “Allowing patients to make appointments in the morning to see a physician later that day is the right prescription for efficiency, according to a new study by researchers at Cornell University’s Johnson School.”

    It reduces waiting time and doctor idle time from no shows.

    http://www.johnson.cornell.edu/news/Robinson_appts.html

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Kendall says:

    Economically efficient or not, it would be interesting to see how much people would pay in order to expedite their waiting-room time. It would be like putting a waiting-room express-lane in. We could see how much people were willing to pay in order to avoid wasting their time waiting. It would demonstrate how valuable people feel their time is… not to mention healthcare would make a killing (because they don’t rip the public off enough aready).

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Jake says:

    How about text messages as to the status of your appointment. In some cases I’ve called the Dr.’s office to see if he is on schedule or 2 hours behind. I’m not waiting for more than 30 minutes without getting upset.

    As a side note, this is also a reason to not go to the Dr. – they are time sucks. FYI I’m healthy, but from their point of view they could probably bring in more revenue if they kept on schedule. Just a thought.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. tracy says:

    Reminds me of the time we went to the Cheesecake Factory in Beverly Hills (yeah, we’re touristy people). You can walk up, talk to the seating hostess to see if a table is open, if not, she’ll give you a pager that will page you when it is/will be soon.

    Not sure though how to make sure people don’t run of with the pager.

    I think, mentally, waiting your appt, pre-conditions your mind regarding your relationship with the doctor and how the appointment will go: he’s the more impt/smarter/superior bet the two of you so you should follow him.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Edward says:

    There are many lean solutions to this problem. One answer is to use paperwork (that has to be done anyway) as buffer time.
    Instead of scheduling a patient every 15 minutes, you schedule a patient every 20 minutes and give the doctor 5 minutes to do paper work at the end of each session (If he doesn’t he will have to do that paper work at the end of the day).

    If he is going slower than expected, then he takes that out of his paper work time – and that paper work is moved BACK to the end of the day.

    Same number of patients get seen with less waiting time and the same (or sometimes better) efficiency for the doctor.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. M.B. says:

    There is no incentive for them to be efficient right now or even to bill correctly or code appropriatly.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Saumya says:

    I think we are all forgetting about the limits of a physician.

    What about insurance companies? They dictate how much time a physician may spend with each patient and which medical costs will be covered and which will not. With the insurance companies submerged in the doctor patient relationships and the rate of malpractice claims always rising, it is very difficult for physicians to put off any paperwork. A single sheet of paper not signed right away can possibly result in a lawsuit.

    There are also not enough resources for the amount of people who need treatment. If you go to any inner city emergency area, you will see a perpetually crowded waiting room. Many of these patients cannot pay for their services, either. This causes many health care facilities to either scramble for money or limit the patients they see.

    It is all about limits. With the way our system is right now, this is the most efficient way.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0