Remember the transportation stimulus package? Whatever happened to that money? I’m pretty sure it got allocated, but weightier transportation stories like hot-air-balloon fraud seem to have bumped highway spending off the front page. To catch you up, here are some recent numbers that are worth mulling over.
“One man’s bureaucratic red tape is another’s essential framework to prevent the public from being ripped off.”
Figures from the California Department of Transportation show that, as of late October, over $2 billion in federal highway funds had been allocated to the state when the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act passed in February. Of that sum, only $837 million had been awarded in construction contracts. Even more surprising, only $51 million, or about 2.5 percent of the total, had actually been disbursed. Given all the talk when the ARRA was passed about the many projects that were “shovel ready” and primed for construction, this is perhaps a bit disheartening. After all, this spending was pitched as a way to pump immediate life into a collapsing economy.
Before you lay siege to the Sacramento statehouse with your torches and pitchforks, there are many qualifying caveats.
First, don’t single out California. Overall, the U.S. Department of Transportation has managed to disburse only $5.5 billion to the states out of the $30.5 billion in available transportation funds. Unless the bulk of the money has accidentally disappeared between the couch cushions in the DOT employee lounge, other states are having trouble spending quickly as well.
Second, there are good reasons for the slow pace of the process. Many procedures have to be followed before government money can be spent, especially on big capital investments. And one man’s bureaucratic red tape is another’s essential framework to prevent the public from being ripped off. Would you like the contracts awarded without a competitive bidding process, or would you like to have the construction cause irreversible environmental damage? If not, proposals have to be prepared, projects evaluated and prioritized, studies completed, presentations given, bids weighed, plans finalized, and so on.
Also, these figures may mask a degree of spending that has already taken place. Undoubtedly, there has been some stimulus as private contractors spend money (e.g. take on new staff) in anticipation of the arrival of stimulus funds. Also, there was some acceleration of state projects that were already in the pipeline.
In addition, there is general consensus that, although the economy has been showing signs of life lately, the recovery will be slow. So the transportation stimulus, even if a bit late in arrival, will still be welcome.
Finally, I have no doubt that many very important transportation benefits will flow from the facilities that are constructed or repaired using this money. The administration was not looking only at the stimulus effects of ARRA transportation package. It was also considering the eventual payoffs in terms of time saved, increased productivity, fatalities prevented, and so on. As Brian Taylor of UCLA and Jianling Li of the University of Texas at Arlington have demonstrated, larger projects, and projects that are more capital-intensive, have slower outlay rates. Thus, while simple tasks like road resurfacing can plow ahead quickly, more “game-changing” and ambitious investments — like building highways or rail transit lines, adding HOV lanes, or improving interchanges — are bound to take a while to gear up.
But I would like to make one plea as a result of these numbers. That is that the phrase “shovel ready” be defined as “ready to shovel.” If we’re looking at two months of shovel design, then a month of steel tensile strength testing, then two more months evaluating the bid from the Matsuhito Shovel and Spade Conglomerate, then a three-month wait while the president’s Council on Shovel Safety comes out with its report, we should probably call it “bureaucracy ready,” or perhaps “advanced-planning ready” if “bureaucracy” is too pejorative a term. If we’re promised immediate stimulus we have a right to immediate stimulus; if the system will take a while to gear up, no matter how worthy the reasons, we have a right to know that going in.

What’s most disheartening is that the people who sold this as an immediate boost to the economy knew exactly how long it would take for the cash to land in struggling citizens’ pockets. This delay may be a surpirse to the general public but these politicians knew better. (As usual.)
Ah yes, the all important outlays like the airport project that has only 35 passengers a day going to that airport? Or how about a bridge that is only linked to 10 families on the other side? I’m sure these are wonderful stimulative projects that will generate significant ROI to taxpayers for years to come.
The caveats are bogus. Again, this money was supposed to be for SHOVEL READY projects, not proposals or interesting ideas.
Eric: Perhaps in a later column you could discuss the pros and cons of, simply, giving the money away to “ordinary” Americans? Obviously, there are some serious inflation concerns, on the one hand, but, on the other, there would be no need for bidding processes, environmental studies and the like. Or maybe a combination of (less) funding for capital projects and (more) tax cuts or grants to ordinary taxpayers would be in order. Your thoughts?
“shovel ready” evokes Depression era photos of hundreds of men, picks, shovels and wheelbarrows, putting food on the table of the unemployed.
While it is desirable to maintain, upgrade and extend our (crumbling) infrastructure, current construction methods require small specialized crews, think bulldozer, backhoe, truck, roller and paver, and the impact on the unemployed would be modest.
For the unskilled there’s only the bright orange best and small flag to wave.
From other reports, it’s fairly obvious that all of that California money went to the 55th Congressional District…
If all that is true, then why is much of the Baltimore beltway and one of the major routes to DC (Route 29) already repaved, along with multiple long-overdue street repairs in the city of Baltimore?
this “stimulus was bogus to start with. such a small portion to be used for actual investment, and that is not working. If they wanted to quicly stimulate the economy they should have picked 1600000 randome TAXPAYERS and awarded them 500000 tax free dollars. That would stimulate the economy!