The Miraculous Decline in Deaths by Fire

New York City is on track this year to break its record for the fewest number of deaths by fire. According to the New York Post:

The department attributes the drop “to an aggressive campaign of fire-safety education and quicker response times,” said Fire Commissioner Sal Cassano.

Maybe. But how about acknowledging the massive technological progress — in building materials, lighting, and many other factors — that has made fire so much less of a menace than it used to be?

To me, the decline of death by fire is one of the most underappreciated success stories of the past 100 years. There are many others, of course. We modernists are very good at pointing out the big problems in contemporary society, but we are even better at failing to acknowledge the progress that has been made, whether in public safety, medicine, food supply, etc.

How drastic is the decline in fire deaths in the U.S.? Consider the following graphic*:

For a time, American history was regularly punctuated by catastrophic fires in which hotels and nightclubs, apartment blocks, and even entire cities burned to the ground. But the death rate due to fire has fallen an astonishing 90 percent over the past century, thanks to a variety of factors: the phasing-out of live-flame lights and fireplaces; the proliferation of fire extinguishers, smoke detectors, and sprinklers; the professionalization of firefighting; fireproof building materials and stricter building codes; and better medical treatment for fire victims.

I am curious: what do you consider the most impressive but underappreciated measures of progress in the past 100 years?

*From our new illustrated edition of SuperFreakonomics.

TAGS: ,

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

 

COMMENTS: 56

  1. Sean says:

    I would have said the can opener but that wouldn’t really fit into the 100 years time line.

    So instead I’ll give a little attention to the all to often ignored computer mouse without which all of our lives would be a little more tedious and quite a bit more annoying.

    I’d also mention Prozak whose effect on the population of the world would be too much to go into here in this tiny comments box.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Eric M. Jones says:

    Death by fire is certainly due to many factors, perhaps the decline in cigarette smoking (and the parallel decline in the availability of matched and lighters) being the biggest.

    As for the greatest underappreciated measure of progress in the last 100 years is the elimination of smallpox and (almost) polio.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. bobi says:

    Indoor toilets

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. JTrupin says:

    Perhaps a broader measure of what you’re discussing above: building codes and their enforcement. The fact that Seattle had a 6.8 earthquake in February of 2001 (when most people were indoors) and no one died is a testament to the value of strict enforcement of modern building codes.

    Every time large numbers of people die in a ‘natural’ disaster, this is one of the first things I think about. How many people would have lived if their governments hadn’t looked the other way?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Mike says:

    I’m going with “Remote Control”.

    BTW, as I get on in age I’m not consuming much if any sliced bread – so sliced bread is way overrated.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Calvin Graham says:

    I remember a university lecturer telling the class that when you look at the development of glass transparency/attenuation in order to make fibre-optic cables, the progress made by the researchers (transparency at the end vs at the start per meter) was greater than any other percentage/ratio style achievement in human achievement

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Jamie says:

    The fact that despite more cars and people road deaths in developing nations have been mostly falling.

    Every long weekend in New South Wales, Australia the death toll on the roads makes headlines. In easter 1997 they trialled double demerit points on people’s licences for speeding etc (while keeping fines the same). Instead of the typical 15 or so deaths on the roads during the three days there were NONE. So they implemented this every long weekend from then on. Deaths rose again but there’s probably 70 or so people alive today who wouldn’t have been without this.

    I know about this programme acutely as I lost my licence on the 1997 easter weekend because of it!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. econobiker says:

    I’m with #2 Eric Jones. Lack of ignition sources contribute the most to catastrophic deaths (match in a night club) and the garden variety smoker dying in bed/couch at home from lighting on fire.

    Also the wide spread use of electric stove tops (including the under glass type) helps too from the catch a room or self on fire while cooking deaths.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0