(iStockphoto)
When it comes to achievement, does it matter if a student and a teacher are the same race? And if so, how much? That’s the essential question posed by a trio of economists in a new working paper, the first to test whether minority instructors have a positive effect on the academic achievement of minority students at the college level.
Their results indicate an emphatic yes, and may hold a partial solution (although a tricky one to enact) to one of the most persistent and vexing problems facing the U.S. education system: the achievement gap between non-minority and minority students. Less than than one-fifth of African-Americans, and less than one-eighth of Latinos between 25 and 29 years-old have a college degree. According to the U.S. Department of Education, only 9.6% of full-time instructional faculty at U.S. colleges are black, Latino or Native American. And yet, these groups make up a third of the college-age population.
Here’s the abstract:
This paper uses detailed administrative data from one of the largest community colleges in the United States to quantify the extent to which academic performance depends on students being of similar race or ethnicity to their instructors. To address the concern of endogenous sorting, we use both student and classroom fixed effects and focus on those with limited course enrollment options. We also compare sensitivity in the results from using within versus across section instructor type variation. Given the computational complexity of the 2-way fixed effects model with a large set of fixed effects we rely on numerical algorithms that exploit the particular structure of the model’s normal equations. We find that the performance gap in terms of class dropout and pass rates between white and minority students falls by roughly half when taught by a minority instructor. In models that allow for a full set of ethnic and racial interactions between students and instructors, we find African-American students perform particularly better when taught by African-American instructors.
From a sample of 30,000 students in nearly 21,000 classes, the authors find that the minority achievement gap shrinks in classes taken with underrepresented minority instructors. While minority students are overall more likely to drop a course, less likely to pass a course, and less likely to have a grade of at least a B, these gaps decrease by 2.9 percentage points, 2.8 percentage points, and 3.2 percentage points respectively when assigned to an instructor of similar minority type.
These effects represent roughly half of the total gaps in classroom outcomes between white and underrepresented minority students. The benefits are largest among black students being taught by black instructors. The class dropout rate relative to whites is 6 percentage points lower for black students when taught by a black instructor.
So, in theory, according to these results, we could wipe out a sizeable portion of the minority student achievement gap by hiring more minority instructors. Easier said than done of course. And, as the authors point out, any policy with that explicit aim would likely have negative consequences, since students appear to react positively when matched to instructors of a similar race, but negatively when not.
and 
. You can also watch it on 
I can definitely see the author’s point, one of the professors I’m closest to is a fellow black male. But it seems to confusing a few different issues. Student achievement in college is part of the wider educational discrepancies, but those in K-12 are likely more important as success begets success and failure more failure. Confusing the portion of students that are college age and actually in college muddles the point. Hopefully someone is doing similar research on primary education so we can close the achievement gap where it matters most.
Yes , minority teachers are required to fill gap between non-minority and minority students. Only 9.6% of full-time instructional faculty at U.S. colleges are black, Latino or Native American. And yet, these groups make up a third of the college-age population.
Or we have to move to online teachers such as http://www.forecastfortomorrow.com/.
Look up “socio-economics” on wikipedia. Faculty come from very well off segments of the population. “blacks, latinos, and native americans” generally do not.
I always did better when the teacher was attractive. So maybe we should work on hiring more attractive teachers and then everyone can do better….
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
17 
0
“We find that the performance gap in terms of class dropout and pass rates between white and minority students falls by roughly half when taught by a minority instructor. ”
Total performance is at least as important as performance gap if not more so, and since presumably the alternative being proposed is to move away from “merit” based hiring and towards “affirmative action”, one can only assume total performance would decrease.
WARNING ANECDOTE:
I grew up a liberal and in my teens and college years a huge fan of affirmative action. My past 10 years of work experience has caused me to drastically re-evaluate that position.
I constantly deal with mid-level staff (career civil servants) at several federal government agencies. These are people in salaried positions making $50,000-$150,000/year. A healthly chunk of them are terrible at their jobs.
What is really horrifying to a liberal like myself…
The competence of the staff people I deal with is inversely correlated with how “minority” they are.
White males/Asians: Nearly universally competent.
White females/Latinos: Hit or miss.
African Americans: Frequently borderline negligent.
Granted we are only talking about a few dozen people here spread across 3 agencies, so this isn’t a huge sample and could be all random chance.
But it is enough people that it doesn’t seem likely it is random chance. I know their is equal opportunity bias in federal HR policies. I have heard some of the African Americans joke “that they could never lose their job” at conferences.
Just to be clear a few of the African American employees are great, and one of the White Male employees is merely average. But when I meet a new contact I can pretty reliably predict that I will need to do a thorough job and follow all the rules to a T if they are a white male, and that pretty much any random slipshod garbage will pass muster if they are African American. It is sad.
Just an anecdote, but it has caused me to re-evaluate affirmative action in any form.
Hot debate. What do you think?
9 
6
I have worked in DC with Federal Employees and can vouch for much of what you are saying. The reality (and this is sad) is that people working in the Federal employment pool are also working from a more “entitled” disposition. I cannot count the number of people in and around DC who talked about landing a full time Fed job like they were playing the lottery!
So I would say that whether you are talking about the gov mandating entitlement programs or employment curves or affirmative action or over simplifying positive correlations, it is one thing to imply things could be better with a stronger metric and another thing entirely when you are forced to achieve the metric goal.
We can (or could 20 years or so ago*) find an instructive counter-example in almost any university engineering or hard science classroom, where the instructor was virtually always a white male, and half or more of the class were international students, mostly from Asia & India.
*Of course these days many of the instructors are now the former international students.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
1
The author accidentally wrote minority when he meant black, Latino and native American. Or really, black and Latino (since Native American is not used consistently.)
As a non black, Latino or native American minority, I am always offended when people talk about minority as if the term automatically excludes Asians, South Asians, Jews, etc. It doesn’t. And it’s misuse legitimizes the discrimination.
This is a serious issue of perpetuating discrimination itself. The perpetuation of the myth that some minorities aren’t discriminated against and others are. Manner of discrimination is varied, perhaps by race, but not absent.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
I think he meant “disadvantaged minority”.
I’m not sure what to make of this. If the suggestion were that underperforming white students should not be taught by black teachers, that would be branded racist, and rightfully so. Why should the opposite be OK?
Note that this is not a general phenomenon: racial minorities in general don’t need teachers of their own race, it is specific minorities. Perhaps we should get to the root of the problem and try to understand why black, Latino, and Native American kids have trouble learning from white teachers. I suspect that it is prejudice and negative stereotypes about white teachers, and those prejudices are going to hinder students later on anyway. Maybe catering to these prejudices is a short term solution and in a few generations the problem will just go away on its own. But there is also a possibility that we are feeding into an obsession with divisiveness and racial stereotyping that is going to be good for noone.
I think this issue is more complex than some minorities learn better from minority teachers, therefore we should just have them taught by minority teachers.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
1
Why does it have to be against negative stereotypes white teachers?
It could be that minorities have negative stereotypes about their own race and achievements, and when being taught by someone successful of their own race serves as a positive role model to follow.
“We all know that race is an issue still today and until it is a complete non-issue minorities have to work harder than their colleagues.”
That’s your assumption; where is the evidence that “minorities” are disadvantaged? What minorities anyway? And wher is the evidence that it is prejudice rather than someone’s attitude or behavior that places them at a disadvantage? Merely looking different or speaking differently doesn’t seem to cause people to put someone at a disadvantage because there are many minorities that are doing well.
Furthermore, how is that different from other factors? I’m an immigrant; I had to work extremely hard to stay in the country, I had very limited job opportunities, was eligible for few scholarships, needed to learn the language, integrate into a new culture, etc. And I’m also a “minority”, I just happen to have white skin color and no lobby.
We have full legal equality, we have anti-discrimination laws, and we have affirmative action. Maybe specific minorities still have problems, but at some point, I don’t see what government can do to help. And more and more social engineering may be exacerbating the problem rather than helping.